My research interests include public opinion, voting behavior and
elections, political institutions, and judicial politics. In
2011
I won the Milton Lodge Award for Graduate Student with Outstanding
Potential (awarded by the faculty of the Political Science Department).
Below you will find summaries of my dissertation and working papers
along with the status of each project.
Dissertation:
The Political Economy:
The
Effect of Public Opinion and the Media Coverage on the Macroeconomy.
My
dissertation uses multivariate GARCH
models to address several overlapping research questions. First, what
effect does media coverage of the president and the economy have on the
electorate’s evaluations of the president’s job
performance? Building upon this analysis, I then address the
role
political evaluations and media coverage play in determining the
stability of consumer confidence. I conclude by showing
presidential approval has a significant effect on both the level and
stability of the macroeconomy even when controlling for objective
economic indicators and consumer sentiment.
Front Burner:
"The Politics of Scandals:
The Case of Supreme Court Nominations, 1877-2010" with Charles Cameron
and Jeffrey Segal.
We
argue that when a nominee's opponents control the
Supreme Court nomination process, they often delay it in the hope of
uncovering a scandal. If a scandal is discovered, they
further
delay the process in order to
exploit the scandal and damage the nominee's prospects of confirmation.
(Under review at the Journal
of Politics)
"The Electoral Costs of Party Loyalty in the House and Senate" in Strategic Party Government
by
Matthew Lebo and Gregory Koger.
As leaders
search for support in
key Congressional votes, the level of electoral safety that a
legislator has is a good determinant of how likely they are to support
the party. Using a two-stage least-squares panel data estimator with
fixed effects and instrumental variables, we find that Senators and
House members are punished electorally for as party unity increases and
members of Congress strategically adjust their level of party unity
according to their degree of electoral security. (Book chapter in
completed manuscript)
"The Political Economy: Political Determinants of the Macroeconomy."
Although much
attention has been
paid to the role economic conditions play in political evaluations,
little attention has been devoted to the role politics plays in
explaining changes in the macroeconomy. I argue that in order to fully
explain changes in the macroeconomy, one needs to incorporate
politics---specifically presidential approval, media coverage, and
political events---in addition to variables typically employed by
economists. (Under review at the
American Political Science Review)
"Large Scale Online Text Analysis Using Lydia."
This paper
introduces the Lydia
system and its method of collecting and classifying entities, describes
each phase of the process, and presents a practical application of the
system for political scientists by examining the value of the Lydia
system in predicting presidential approval. I find media
coverage
of the president and economy affects not just how approval rises and
falls but also how it expands and contracts. (In preparation for
submission)
"The Causes and Consequences of Instability in Consumer Sentiment."
The level of
consumer sentiment
is affected by both economic conditions and political evaluations, but
what factors affect sentiment volatility? Furthermore, what
are
political consequences of instability in economic evaluations? (Data
analysis)
"Pink Slips and Policy Preferences: An Examination of the Effects of
the Economy on Supreme Court Voting."
I use a random
coefficient model
of individual justices' votes on the merits in labor cases to determine
the extent to which economic conditions affect judicial decision
making. As economic conditions worsen, conservative justices
vote
more liberally, sacrificing their preferred policy in favor of more
advantageous public policy. (Working paper)
Back Burner:
"Approval
Gaps and Partisan
Polarization in the American Electorate"
with Matthew Lebo, Heather Ondercin, and Christopher Weber.
What are the
long- and short-term
forces that explain partisan polarization within the American
electorate? We look at several important cleavages within the
electorate and how the various groups respond to different economic and
political factors over time in evaluating the president. (Working paper)
"The (De)Mobilizing Effects of Negative Advertising" with Wendy Gross.
We extend the
analysis of
advertising and election outcomes by exploring the effects of timing,
tone, and exposure to negative television advertising on split-ticket
voting in U.S. Senate and gubernatorial races. We also model
the
factors that increase the number of attack ads aired in each campaign.
(Working paper)
"The Persistence of the Sexuality Gap" with Wendy Gross.
While there is
general agreement
that the LGBT community is more liberal than the general population,
academic research has relied on samples that are small in size,
non-representative, or exclusive to the LGBT community, effectively
restricting the inferential power. Utilizing a nationally
representative sample of 30,000 adults, including approximately 3,000
self-identified LGBT individuals, we explore whether a
“sexual
identity gap” is the result of differences in traditional
political predictors or whether it persists after accounting for these
variables. (Data collection and analysis)
"Why Do Individuals Comply with Informal Institutions?" with Martijn
Schoonvelde.
Applying
theories of cooperation
to a variety of informal institutions including judicial review and
prime minister selection, we explain why informal political
institutions shape our behavior in ways that could be costly to
individuals. (Working paper)
"Choice of Party Ballot in Open Primaries Under Changing Rules: A
Quasi-Experiment" with Arnold Fleischmann and Damon Cann.
We analyze a
heavily Democratic
county's open primaries both before and after most local elections
became nonpartisan and were removed from primary ballots to study the
effect of electoral systems and competition on voter
participation. Competition for local offices, rather than
federal
or statewide offices, is major determinant of Republican or Democratic
ballot choice and the removal of local offices from the primary ballot
has a positive effect on the likelihood that a voter would choose a
Republican ballot. (In preparation for submission)